AI Duell Logo
Consensus
ConsensusWebsite
Consensus logo

Consensus

AI search in 200M+ scientific papers with Consensus Meter and evidence strength

Website
Pricing:Freemium
From:7.99 €/Mo
Free Trial:No
88/ 100Gesamtwertung
Benutzerfreundlichkeit
9.0
Funktionsumfang
8.0
Preis-Leistung
9.0
KI-Qualität
9.0

Our Consensus review 2026 tests the AI science search engine with Consensus Meter, paper summaries, and GPT-4 synthesis. Premium from $7.99/month (annually).

Pros & Cons

Vorteile

  • Unique Consensus Meter visually shows the percentage of research that supports or refutes a claim.
  • GPT-4-based paper summaries directly address the research question with methodology notes.
  • Search exclusively in peer-reviewed studies — no blogs or non-scientific sources.
  • Simplest interface of all science research tools — immediately productive without a learning curve.
  • Lowest premium pricing among AI science tools at $7.99/month (annually).

Nachteile

  • Primarily English-language literature — non-English studies less represented.
  • No systematic review workflow like Elicit — better for quick evidence checks than formal reviews.
  • Consensus Meter can be misleading when research has recently been disrupted by new large-scale studies.
  • No structured data extraction like Elicit — less suitable for formal meta-analyses.
  • Database of 200M papers — slightly less current than direct PubMed or Semantic Scholar searches.

Features

Evidence-Based Answers

Consensus directly answers questions based on scientific studies and shows what percentage of research supports a claim.

Paper Search with AI Extract

Each found paper is given a compact AI extract of the core claim so relevance can be quickly assessed.

Consensus Meter

A visual indicator shows how strong the scientific consensus on a question is — from 'strongly supported' to 'controversial'.

Study Type Filter

Search results can be filtered by study type, such as RCTs, meta-analyses, or systematic reviews.

Citation Export

Found papers can be directly exported as citations in APA, MLA, or other formats.

Copilot Feature

An AI copilot helps refine the research question and obtain more relevant results.

In Detail

A comprehensive Consensus review in 2026 shows that this AI-powered science search engine takes a unique approach: it searches exclusively in peer-reviewed scientific publications and visualizes whether the research community tends toward a consensus on a given question — through the unique "Consensus Meter."

The Consensus Meter: A Unique Feature

Consensus's defining feature is the Consensus Meter: when you ask a research question (e.g., "Is intermittent fasting effective for weight loss?"), Consensus analyzes relevant studies and visually shows what percentage of the research supports, refutes, or is inconclusive on the topic. This provides an instant overview of where the scientific evidence stands.

GPT-4-Based Paper Summaries

Consensus uses GPT-4 for synthesis and summarization. Rather than just delivering links, the tool generates precise summaries that directly address the research question — including methodology notes and sample sizes. This enables rapid relevance assessment without reading every article in full.

Who Is Consensus For?

Consensus is ideal for medical students and physicians (EBM), science journalists, policy makers needing evidence-based decisions, and anyone who needs to quickly understand what research says about a health, behavioral, or scientific question.

FAQ

Consensus has a free plan with limited searches. Premium costs around $8.99/month for unlimited searches and advanced features.

Consensus has access to over 200 million scientific papers, primarily through Semantic Scholar.

Consensus is suitable for both. The interface is simple enough for laypeople, and the results are rigorous enough for researchers.

Consensus directly shows AI-generated summaries and scientific consensus rather than just providing links to papers.

Consensus can provide good initial insights but does not replace a doctor's assessment. It shows existing research, not individual recommendations.

Some links on this page may be partner links.